Legal Opinion

Valenta v. Life Insurance Company of North America

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1972No. Civ. 8793PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEIGEN, Judge.

The defendant (hereinafter insurance company) has appealed from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the failure of the jury to agree on a verdict.

This is an action brought by the widow, designated and named as the beneficiary of an accident insurance policy insuring F. C. Valenta against accidental bodily injury and death. The issues were tried and submitted to a jury. At the close of all the testimony the insurance company moved for a directed verdict on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to prove that Mr. Valenta’s death resulted from accidental…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Larson v. MeyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Lindenberg v. FolsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Jacobson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Bartholomay v. St. Thomas Lumber CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Linington v. McLean CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Riebe v. RiebeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Rau v. KirschenmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Kasper v. Provident Life Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Dehn v. Otter Tail Power Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Rau v. KirschenmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API