Brady v. Safety-Kleen Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
The precise issue before us on certification from the federal district court is whether R.C. 4121.801 is unconstitutional in whole or in part *628under the Ohio Constitution. For the reasons that follow, we hold that R.C. 4121.80 exceeds the scope of legislative authority granted to the General Assembly under the Ohio Constitution, and is therefore unconstitutional in to to.
I
For some thirteen years following the 1911 enactment of the workers’ compensation system, Ohio specifically excepted injuries arising from an employer’s “willful act” from the general grant of employer common-law *629immunity.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Kunkler v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- State, Ex Rel. v. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
- Taylor v. Academy Iron & Metal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- Sorrell v. ThevenirOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Hannah v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Stetter v. R.J. Corman Derailment Services, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.