Legal Opinion

Poley v. Lacert

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1899PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From Wallowa: Robert Eakin, Judge. Action by B. F. Poley against J. T. D. Lacert. Judgment'for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This is an appeal from a decree foreclosing a bond for a deed. The transcript shows that on March 26, 1895, plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant whereby he agreed, in consideration of the payment of $1,568, to sell and convey to him about six acres of land in Wallowa County, and, as appurtenant thereto, “the exclusive water right to sufficient water to operate one thirty-inch water wheel,” placed in a sawmill on said land; *167that the purchase price was evidenced by defendant’s promissory notes, payable on the dates and for the respective sums as follows: September 1, 1895, $500;…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greenby v. WilcocksNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  2. Levitzky v. CanningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Hanson v. Buckner'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
  4. Sedgwick v. HollenbackNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  5. Rhode v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1866

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. International Trust Co. v. Decker Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
  2. Culver v. RandleOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Wold v. League of the CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Thomas v. Booth-Kelly Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Parkersville Drainage District v. WattierOregon Supreme Court · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API