Wold v. League of the Cross
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A motion by the League of the Cross of the Archdiocese of San Francisco, Incorporated; Frank J. Grimley, Luke Carroll, James E. Power, William H. McCarthy and R. W. Gillogley, defendants and respondents in the above-entitled action, for an order dismissing plaintiffs’ appeal on the ground that the latter have accepted the bene fits of the judgment appealed from. The defendant first named is a nonstock corporation, and the other defendants are members thereof. The complaint set forth three causes of action, the first being a claim for rent in the sum of $2,025 for the use of a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Reynes v. DumontSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Hinchman v. Point Defiance Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- County of San Bernardino v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Reynolds v. AddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Moog v. MoogCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Mathys v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Keyes v. HurlbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Henderson v. NixonIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
- Clarke v. Angelus Memorial Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.