Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Buckner's

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 16, 1836PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Covenant. From the Circuit Court for Bracken County. Statement of the case. When a bill of exceptions state* that a party read the record of a suit, as evidence, it must be understood that the entire record was offered, & made evidence, though but a part was legal evidence iij the case on trial ; and unless it appears that the inadmissible portion was objected to, it will be presumed that the objecfip^ was waived.

Read the full summary

Covenant. From the Circuit Court for Bracken County. Statement of the case. When a bill of exceptions state* that a party read the record of a suit, as evidence, it must be understood that the entire record was offered, & made evidence, though but a part was legal evidence iij the case on trial ; and unless it appears that the inadmissible portion was objected to, it will be presumed that the objecfip^ was waived. The consideration q f- • natural affection is sufficient to sustain a covenant of yvavranty, at law or in equity: the relation of grandfather and grandchild is vyitjhin.…

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Ewing

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

In 1819, Philip Buckner, for the consideration expressed in the deed, of five hundred dollars, conveyed to Amos O. Hanson two hundred acres of land—with covenant of general warranty. After Buckner’s death, this suit was brought against his executor and devisees, for an alleged breach of the warranty.

Defendants plead covenants performed—with leav® to set up any matter in defence, which could be specially pleaded, &c.

After the plaintiff had closed his evidence, on the trial, the Court, at the instance of the defendant’s counsel, instructed the jury,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Butler v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1823
  2. Devour v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1814

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Capital Lumber Co. v. BarthMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Lockhart v. Kentland Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Mason v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. First Bank of Texola v. TerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Perry v. Krish & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API