Tiffany Ann Cole v. State of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
Tiffany Ann Cole, an inmate under sentences of death, appeals an order of the circuit court denying her motion for post-conviction relief filed undér Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851.1 We have ju*536risdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the postconviction court’s denial of relief for a new guilt phase but grant Cole a new penalty phase based on the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Hurst v. Florida (Hurst v. Florida), — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and this Court’s opinion on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Chiquita Brands Int'l, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018
- WILL TWIGG v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- WILL TWIGG v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018