Legal Opinion

Tiffany Ann Cole v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 29, 2017No. SC13-2245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Tiffany Ann Cole, an inmate under sentences of death, appeals an order of the circuit court denying her motion for post-conviction relief filed undér Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851.1 We have ju*536risdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the postconviction court’s denial of relief for a new guilt phase but grant Cole a new penalty phase based on the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Hurst v. Florida (Hurst v. Florida), — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and this Court’s opinion on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Chiquita Brands Int'l, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018
  2. WILL TWIGG v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. WILL TWIGG v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API