Legal Opinion

Basch & Strohl v. Schunk

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1932No. Appeal 26Published

Pennsylvania Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Cuyler, 283 Pa. 422.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Ctjbiam,

Mrs. Basch, one of the plaintiffs, is the owner of premises adjacent to a park in the City of Scranton, which premises she claims abnt on an improved road bordering the park; the other plaintiff is the tenant in possession occupying certain refreshment booths and stands designed to cater to visitors to the park. The city claims that the highway is a part of the park area, and that the plaintiffs have no right of access to it. The city is about to erect a fence along plaintiffs’ premises thus preventing an entry on the road by the plaintiff or her tenant.

The court, upon application…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conrad v. StahlmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API