Legal Opinion
Davis v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 1, 1942No. 30735PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This is an action to reform or cancel certain previously executed deeds’ in order to effect a proper division of property and to confirm or recover possession of such propérty in accord with the division. The action is therefore equitable in nature. Gault v. Spears, 125 Okla. 126, 256 P. 515; Simon v. Hine, 78 Okla. 224, 190 P. 264.
The action was instituted in the district court of Pittsburg county on September 10, 1940, by C. C. Jackson, Arthur Jackson, and Luther Jackson against Ida May Davis, formerly Jackson, as defendant. The plaintiffs prevailed in the trial court, and the defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Order of United Commercial Travelers v. McAdamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Oklahoma City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Whittaker v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Davidson v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Higgins v. ClassenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Pasotex Petroleum Company, a Corporation v. M.B. CameronCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- French v. LeachmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Waltrip v. CathcartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952