United Bank v. Buckingham
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
United Bank v. Richard Buckingham, et al., Misc. No. 1, September Term, 2020. Opinion by Getty, J. COMMERCIAL LAW – MARYLAND UNIFORM FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE ACT – CHANGE IN LIFE INSURANCE BENEFICIARY CONSTITUTES CONVEYANCE – Court of Appeals held that a change in a life insurance beneficiary constitutes a “conveyance” under the Maryland Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act, Maryland Code, Commercial Law Article (“CL”) §§ 15-201 to 15-214 (1975, 2013 Repl. Vol.). Court of Appeals concluded that a change in a life insurance beneficiary falls within the meaning of “conveyance” as defined in CL §…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Kushell v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- State v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1821
- Lutz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
- Deville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Nationstar Mortgage v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Moore v. RealPage Utility ManagementCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Williams v. Morgan State Univ.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Wadsworth v. SharmaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.