Legal Opinion

United Bank v. Buckingham

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 9, 2021No. 1m/20PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

United Bank v. Richard Buckingham, et al., Misc. No. 1, September Term, 2020. Opinion by Getty, J. COMMERCIAL LAW – MARYLAND UNIFORM FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE ACT – CHANGE IN LIFE INSURANCE BENEFICIARY CONSTITUTES CONVEYANCE – Court of Appeals held that a change in a life insurance beneficiary constitutes a “conveyance” under the Maryland Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act, Maryland Code, Commercial Law Article (“CL”) §§ 15-201 to 15-214 (1975, 2013 Repl. Vol.). Court of Appeals concluded that a change in a life insurance beneficiary falls within the meaning of “conveyance” as defined in CL §…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kushell v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. State v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1821
  4. Lutz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  5. Deville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Nationstar Mortgage v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Moore v. RealPage Utility ManagementCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Williams v. Morgan State Univ.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  5. Wadsworth v. SharmaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API