State v. McKellips

¶ 1. Rory McKellips appeals a judgment of conviction for use of a computer to facilitate a child sex crime contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.075.1 McKellips argues the State failed to prove he communicated with the victim via a "computerized communication system." Alternatively, he argues Wis. Stat. § 948.075 is unconstitutionally vague regarding the meaning of computerized communication system.2 We conclude that the jury was improperly instructed concerning use of a computerized communication system, and that, consequently, the real controversy was not *778fully tried. We therefore reverse and remand…