State v. Rory A. McKellips

¶ 55. (dissenting). The instant case concerns the interpretation of the phrase "computerized communication system" in *476Wis. Stat. § 948.075(lr) (2013-14)1 and its application to Rory McKellips' exchange of phone calls, voicemails, and text messages with a minor, C.H.

¶ 56. McKellips was charged with repeated sexual assault of a child, exposing genitals or pubic area, obstructing an officer, and use of a "computerized communication system" to facilitate a child sex crime.

¶ 57. The jury acquitted McKellips of the sexual assault and exposure counts.2 Even though the jury did not find McKellips…