Dan Martin Sam v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
The appellant was indicted and convicted of rape of another Indian within Indian country under 18 U.S.C. § 1153, sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment, and has taken this appeal.
The main point relied on for reversal is that the trial court erred in refusing to postpone or grant a continuance for the purpose of allowing appellant to secure counsel of his own choice.
The events leading up to the trial court’s ruling must first be related. The alleged crime occurred on or about September 15, 1966. Appellant’s trial attorney was appointed on September 30, 1966, and appellant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alfred William Leino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- H. T. Jordan, Jr. v. United States of America, Gervase A. Bryant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Andreas v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Waley v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Richard J. MaestasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. David S. KuckCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- State v. MonteiroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
- United States v. James Michael BakerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.