Legal Opinion

United States v. David S. Kuck

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 29, 1978No. 77-1569PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

The issue in this appeal is whether the special parole term provided in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b) violates the United States Constitution. On a Rule 35, F.R.Crim.P., motion for vacation of sentence, the district court upheld the special parole provision and this appeal followed.

The jury found defendant-appellant Kuck guilty of charges relating to the manufacture, distribution, and possession of amphetamines and methamphetamines in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a). On June 10, 1977, he was sentenced to five-year concurrent terms with a special parole term of five…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Douglas RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. State v. GriffithTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  4. United States v. Leo KleinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Dickerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API