Legal Opinion
Alfred William Leino v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1964No. 7726PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
A jury found appellant Leino guilty of a violation of the Dyer Act 1 and he appeals.
Leino was arrested in New Mexico on November 15,1962, and released on bond. The indictment was returned on April 26, 1963. Arraignment was continued three times because Leino did not appear. On October 4, 1963, Leino was present for arraignment. After the court explained his right to counsel, Lei-no asked for a continuance so that he could employ counsel. The case was set over to October 11. Leino appeared and requested appointment of counsel. Another continuance of a week was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Neufield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- George Stine Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. George v. ArlenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Camara v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. William Davis v. Hon. Daniel McMann Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New York,respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- John B. Sanders, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Luis Alvaro HoyosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- McCuin v. Texas Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Robert Bolivar DepughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.