Legal Opinion

Hendershot v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1993No. B076367PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J.

This writ proceeding was brought after the respondent court refused to honor a motion to a trial filed under Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6. The motion was made after we reversed an earlier judgment and remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing and determination of a factual issue. We issued an alternative writ and, following full briefing and oral argument, we now grant the relief requested.

Factual and Procedural Summary

The underlying trial arose out of a suit for breach of contract by Pacific Southwestern Investments, Inc. (PSI). Three defendants were named in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. People v. GulbrandsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Peracchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Stubblefield Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Ziesmer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Paterno v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API