People v. Koening
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, committed at Oroville, county of Butte, July 8, 1892. He moved for a new trial which was denied, and thereupon he appeals. He was convicted as an accomplice of one Sarah Brady, who admits that she committed the offense, and the only question calling for discussion relates to the sufficiency of the evidence in corroboration of said Brady.
The testimony tended to show that on the 3d of July, 1892, defendant engaged to one Klein to tend bar for the latter in place of his regular bar-tender, who was ill. Defendant and Sarah Brady…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. AmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- People v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. BraunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- People v. WoodcockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. CianiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.