Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Ciani

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1930No. Docket No. 101PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, Acting P. J.

By an information filed in the Superior Court of Fresno County appellants were charged with the crime of grand theft. It is alleged that they “unlawfully took the property of the Bond Investment Company, a corporation, consisting of 110 sweat-boxes of raisins, of a value in excess of $200.00, in lawful money of the United States.” They were tried upon their pleas of not guilty and the jury found both guilty as charged. Their motion for a new trial was denied and they were sentenced to confinement in the state penitentiary for the term prescribed by law.

One Mike Devineentis was charged in a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. People v. RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. People v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Filson v. the Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. ReingoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. People v. ToddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. SantoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. People v. WillmurthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API