Legal Opinion

United States v. Washington

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 5, 1999No. 98-0316 (PLF)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

The issue before the Court is whether defendant’s possession of 29.1 grams of material containing small amounts of low strength cocaine base is relevant conduct that should be considered in arriving at defendant’s sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. In his memoranda in aid of sentencing, defendant objects to the consideration of the 29.1 grams of material on two grounds: (1) that it contained small amounts of cocaine base only because it was contaminated by the police during their collection of evidence, and (2) that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Wayne Eugene Walker and Joe Guerra, United States of America v. Robert BouvierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Burch, Larry D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Glenda Newsome, Shawn Lee Rawls, Edwin Eugene Trout, United States of America v. Kenneth Birchfield, James Anthony AngeramiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. PatriarcaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API