Legal Opinion

United States v. Washington

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 5, 1999No. 98-0316 (PLF)Published

1Opinion of the Court

38 F.Supp.2d 21 (1999)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

Reginald W. WASHINGTON, Defendant.

No. 98-0316 (PLF).

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

March 5, 1999.

Mark Carroll, Assistant United States Attorney, Washington, DC, for government.

Robert W. Mance, Washington, DC, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

The issue before the Court is whether defendant's possession of 29.1 grams of material containing small amounts of low strength cocaine base is relevant conduct that should be considered in arriving at defendant's sentence under the United States Sentencing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Wayne Eugene Walker and Joe Guerra, United States of America v. Robert BouvierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Burch, Larry D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Glenda Newsome, Shawn Lee Rawls, Edwin Eugene Trout, United States of America v. Kenneth Birchfield, James Anthony AngeramiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. PatriarcaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API