Haney Electric Co. v. Hurst
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Justice.
This is a motion to require appellants, Haney Electric Company and Marion Willard Stewart, to file additional supersedeas bonds. Appellees obtained a money judgment for $189,000 against appellants who have perfected their appeal and filed a su-persedeas bond for $100,000. Appellees assert that this bond is insufficient. We agree.
Rule 364(a) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure provides that an appellant has the right to suspend the execution of a judgment by giving a good and sufficient bond to be approved by the clerk of the district court in a sum “at least the amount of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Merritt v. J. A. Stafford Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- New v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Mea v. MeaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Rudolph v. CassidySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Schrader v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
3Cited by4 opinions
- Texaco Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, State of Texas, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Beavers v. Beavers, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
- Yaghoub "Jacob" Kohannim v. Parvaneh Katoli, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2011
- Yaghoub "Jacob" Kohannim v. Parvaneh Katoli, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2011