Legal Opinion

Rudolph v. Cassidy

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 6, 1956No. 5-883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellee Florence D. Cassidy obtained a $30,000 judgment against appellant Marjory Holt Rudolph in a personal injury case and the cause is here on appeal. Appellant has filed in this court a motion to be permitted to file a supersedeas bond in the sum of $25,000, alleging that she is insolvent and cannot make a $30,000 bond but that she has liability insurance and is able to make a $25,000 bond. The insurance carrier is not a party to the litigation. Since appellant alleges in the motion that she is insolvent it is obvious that a bond for only part of the judgment is for the benefit of one…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Royal Theater Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Todd v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Fitzgerald v. AddisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Rosato v. PentonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  4. Haney Electric Co. v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Coking Coal, Inc. v. Arkoma Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API