Legal Opinion
Beavers v. Beavers
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided May 2, 1983No. 05-82-01341-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUITTARD, Chief Justice.
On Motion to Increase Supersedeas Bond
In this divorce case the appellee wife has filed a motion under rule 365 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure to require an additional supersedeas bond. The decree awards a money recovery against the husband, but suspends execution pending payment of monthly installments, provides for acceleration of the balance on default, and allows a “reasonable” attorney’s fee in the event of further proceedings. The superse-deas bond filed by the husband covers only the installments that will fall due during a period of one year. The wife…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Hall v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Dunn v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Schwartz v. JeffersonTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Hargrove v. Insurance Investment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dallas County Community College District v. Bolton, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
- Medical Administrators, Inc. v. Koger Properties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- Michael Grishman v. Roger Sims, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2018
- Owens Corning v. General Lee Cole, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997