Legal Opinion

Lavenburg v. Universal Sportwear, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1950PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

Motion No. 70 to adjudicate petitioner’s attorney’s lien and to direct payment thereof, and motion No. 71 of the *319United States to dismiss the petition, are considered together. Petitioner’s motion is granted, and the motion to dismiss, is denied.

The petitioner is a member of the bar, and, as such, rendered divers services pursuant to a retainer on behalf of the U. S. Garment Corporation, in a suit brought against the Universal Sportwear, Inc., under which petitioner was to be paid 50% of the amount received by suit, settlement or otherwise, contingent upon recovery, together with his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Herlihy v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Meltzer v. CegliaNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. RAY E. NELSON TRANSPORTATION CO. v. Tri-State Insurance Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1964
  3. Bree v. BeallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Lee v. MackNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Lemar Paint Products Co. v. Di MiceliNew York Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API