Legal Opinion

Lemar Paint Products Co. v. Di Miceli

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavid Kusnetz, J.

Motion by plaintiff for summary judgment against the defendant Gulf Construction Linwood Corp. Cross motion by the United States of America for an order dismissing the interpleading complaint and for leave to intervene as a party plaintiff.

Plaintiff sold some paint to the defendants Di Miceli and Perna, who had contracted to do some work for the defendant Gulf. As a result of these transactions, Gulf owed money to Di Miceli and Perna, who in turn owed money to the plaintiff. Di Miceli and Perna authorized Gulf to pay the money to the plaintiff. Before Gulf had made the payment, the United…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adler v. NicholasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  2. Lavenburg v. Universal Sportwear, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. In re SillsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Herter v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  2. Gordon v. FeldmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API