Legal Opinion

State v. McKinney

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1996No. CR-93-0362-AP, CR-93-0377-APPublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Chief Justice.

This consolidated appeal is the first for these defendants foñowing their convictions for two murders, committed two weeks apart, during the commission of residential burglaries. The trials were held simultaneously using dual juries, which this court approved in advance.1 On November 12,1992, McKinney’s jury found him guñty of first degree murder for the deaths of Christene Mertens and Jim McClain. That same day, Hedlund’s jury found him guñty of second degree murder for Mertens’ death and guñty of first degree murder for McClain’s death. The court sentenced…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. State v. NewellArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. DavoltArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. GreeneArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. HoskinsArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API