State v. Stowers
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.
An expert witness’s testimony that the behavior of an alleged child victim of sexual abuse is consistent with behavior observed in sexually abused children is admissible under the Ohio Rules of Evidence. Therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting Dr. Tener’s testimony.
According to the appellate court’s formulation of the issue certified to this court, if the expert testimony at issue is inadmissible, it is because it “impermissibly conveys to the jury the expert’s belief the child was actually abused.” It is permissible, however, for an expert to convey this belief…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. BostonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. GersinOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by66 opinions
- United States v. Wayne Lewis CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- State v. BolesOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. NemethOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Logerquist v. McVeyArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Nilavar v. OsbornOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.