State v. Nemeth
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
The issue in this case is whether Ohio recognizes “battered child syndrome” as a valid topic for expert testimony in the defense of parricide. Expert testimony on battered child syndrome is admissible in Ohio courts when it is relevant and meets the requirements of Evid.R. 702. The defendant, Brian Nemeth, has been diagnosed with battered child syndrome and it is relevant to his defense in a variety of ways. Further, the testimony proffered by the defense on battered child syndrome meets the requirements of Evid.R. 702. Therefore, although the syndrome is not recognized as an independent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- United States v. Randolph JakobetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- State v. BuellOhio Supreme Court · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. WereOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. HartmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Terry v. CaputoOhio Supreme Court · 2007
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.