Legal Opinion

State v. Gersin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1996No. 94-2739PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

It is tragic that child sexual abuse cases are so prevalent that a body of law has been created which addresses their unique issues. Today, we are faced with yet another such case, and hold that a defendant in a child sexual abuse case may present testimony as to the proper protocol for interviewing child victims regarding their abuse. Rather than infringing upon the fact finder’s role, such testimony assists the trier of fact, and therefore is consistent with this court’s holding in State v. Boston (1989), 46 Ohio St.3d 108, 545 N.E.2d 1220.

In Boston, this court held that “[a]n expert may…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BostonOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Jeffrey Washington v. Sunny Schriver, Superintendent, Wallkill Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. State v. MuttartOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. StowersOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Barlow v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Jeffrey Washington v. Sunny Schriver, Superintendent, Wallkill Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API