Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Hauser Malting Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 24, 1903No. Nos. 13,503—(180)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Brill, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
This appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint in an action brought by the receiver of the insolvent Allemannia Bank under the statute (Laws 1899, p. 315, c. 272). The plaintiff alleged that defendant was a corporation, the general nature of whose business was
“The manufacture and sale of malt, buying, selling and dealing in hops, barley, and other grains * * * and dealing in * * * the utensils, apparatus, implements, articles, and materials used by brewers in equipping and operating breweries and * * * brewery supplies.”
Defendant demurred upon the ground that the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Whitney Arms Co. v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Bradley v. BallardIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Beecher v. Marquette & Pacific Rolling Mill Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Manchester & Lawrence Railroad v. Concord RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bell v. KirklandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- State v. Mortgage Security Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Northland Produce Co. v. StephensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. Crookston State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Olson v. Warroad Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.