Legal Opinion

State v. Thomason

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1937No. 43967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Anders@N, J.

-The defendant was charged in a county attorney’s information jointly with one Elmer Boyles, alias Joe More, with a violation of Code section 12936. The defendant, William Pink Thomason, was tried separately. The facts are not in controversy. The defendant offered no testimony. The' State’s testimony, so far as shown by the record, shows-that on the date charged in the information the defendants, after following a truck loaded with liquor for some distance, were blocked on a side road by the officers of Union and Clarke Counties, and in their attempt to get away drove their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bosse v. MaryeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. State v. ComstockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. State v. RoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. State v. ErleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BaychSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Smull v. DelaneyNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Whalen v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Whalen v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API