Legal Opinion

State v. Erle

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 22, 1930No. 40391PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

The State contends that the act charged in the information is within the purview of the provisions of the Iowa Child Labor Law, as defined in Section 1526, in Chapter 76, Code, 1927. The defendant-appellant contends that the act charged is not within the purview of the prohibition defined in said section, but is within the proviso or exception as defined therein. The only matter, therefore, that is involved on this appeal is the construction to be placed on the language of Section 1526, with special reference to the included exception.

We have nothing to do with the wisdom of the legislative…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kenny v. Bankers Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. State v. ShoreyOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Haller v. Quaker Oats Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Mortensen v. Central Life Assurance Ass'n of the United StatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Taylor v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Denman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  2. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. LowrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  3. State v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  4. Denman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  5. Fleming v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API