Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Wolf
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 1, 1993No. 82 W.D. MISC. DKT. 1992PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY, Justice.
The limited issue before this Court is whether Petitioner, Theodore Wolf, is entitled to a stay of the mandatory one year suspension of his driver’s license during the pendency of his appeal from his conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol (“DOT”). For the reasons that follow, we conclude that Petitioner is not entitled to a supersedeas or stay of the mandatory suspension pending appeal, and that the trial court possesses no authority to stay the mandatory suspension beyond the date of sentencing under the facts of this case.
On April 9, 1992, a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Process Gas Consumers GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Fischer v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Love v. Borough of StroudsburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. StrunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DuffeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Kiebort v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Bell v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- STATE, DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY v. DegrossiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Commonwealth Department of Transportation v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.