Legal Opinion

Love v. Borough of Stroudsburg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1991PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY*, Justice.

The issues presented in this appeal are, whether a borough ordinance creating a restrictive residential parking scheme is a valid exercise of police power; and whether the ordinance, if valid under the police power, violates the equal protection provisions of the Pennsylvania Constitution. For *322the reasons that follow we find the ordinance withstands both challenges as made by the appellant.

On May 21, 1987, the Borough of Stroudsburg adopted ordinance No. 636 authorizing the future establishment of residential parking districts and detailing the manner in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Fischer v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. County Board of Arlington County v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. William Laubach & Sons v. EastonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Love v. Borough of StroudsburgCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Small v. HornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. League of Women Voters of PA v. CmwlthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. WolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Erfer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API