City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
Was the hearing of March 22,1933, as a matter of fact, a rate-making or a charge-fixing proceeding?
If it was a rate-making proceeding, it was and is a nullity pure and simple, as the commission failed to comply with statutory requirements.
If it was a charge-fixing proceeding, was it authorized by law, and if authorized by law was the city of Cleveland, under the facts and the law, entitled to be heard at the time and in the manner insisted upon by its counsel?
Whether such proceeding was authorized by law or not, and whether the city of Cleveland had a right to be made a party, and heard, or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Columbus Gas & Fuel Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- Shaw-Fahrer Grain Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Dayton Communications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Harrison v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Great Miami Valley Taxpayers Assn. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Coalition for Safe Electric Power v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.