Legal Opinion

Groce v. Greenville, Spartanburg & Anderson Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 28, 1913No. 8492PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motion in the original jurisdiction.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydricic.

Plaintiff brought this action solely for the purpose of obtaining an injunction, and appeals from an order refusing an' injunction until the case can be heard on the merits. So much of the complaint as is material to the consideration of the appeal is, in substance, as follows: That plaintiff is the owner of a tract of land which is bounded on the west by Middle Tyger River, her line extending to1 the center of the stream; that, in May, 1912, she granted defendant a right of way over said tract along a certain route which had been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McCownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Columbia Water Power Co. v. NunamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  3. Riley v. Charleston Union Station Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  4. South Bound R. R. v. BurtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  5. Granger v. Postal Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Valuation Proceedings under Sections 303(c) & 306Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1977
  2. Sheriff v. City of EasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  3. Seabrook v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  4. Cedar Cove Homeowners Ass'n v. DiPietroCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Cedar Cove Homeowners Ass'n v. DiPietroCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API