Legal Opinion

Bortner v. CNA Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 7, 1984No. 00358 HBG 82PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant challenges the lower court’s order finding that (1) appellee’s action for post-mortem work loss benefits was timely filed and (2) “stacking” of No-fault insurance benefits is permitted. We agree with appellant that stacking is prohibited in the No-fault context; however, based upon the record before us, we are unable to determine the timeliness of appellee’s action. Accordingly, we reverse in part and remand in part.

*408On May 21, 1977, appellee’s decedent died as a result of injuries sustained in an automobile accident on that same date. Appellee, decedent’s father and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Kamperis v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Sachritz v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Swartz v. MasloffCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Kirsch v. Nationwide InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graf v. State Farm InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Augostine v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API