Bortner v. CNA Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant challenges the lower court’s order finding that (1) appellee’s action for post-mortem work loss benefits was timely filed and (2) “stacking” of No-fault insurance benefits is permitted. We agree with appellant that stacking is prohibited in the No-fault context; however, based upon the record before us, we are unable to determine the timeliness of appellee’s action. Accordingly, we reverse in part and remand in part.
*408On May 21, 1977, appellee’s decedent died as a result of injuries sustained in an automobile accident on that same date. Appellee, decedent’s father and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Kamperis v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Sachritz v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Swartz v. MasloffCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Kirsch v. Nationwide InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Graf v. State Farm InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Augostine v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984