Legal Opinion

Augostine v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1984No. 00295 Pittsburgh, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Judge:

Robert J. Augostine appeals an order granting summary judgment in favor of his no-fault insurer, appellee Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Co., on his claim for medical expenses and work loss benefits under the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, 40 P.S. § 1009.101 et seq. At issue on this appeal is whether appellant’s claims were time-barred. We conclude that his claims were timely at least in part, and thus vacate and remand for further proceedings.

Reviewing the record in the light most favorable to appellant, as we are required to do on appeal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kamperis v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Sachritz v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Lane v. SchachtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Myers v. USAA Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Guiton v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dauphin Deposit Bank & Trust Co. v. TennySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Anthony v. Paxton National Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Warren County1987
  3. Driscoll v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Driscoll v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Driscoll v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API