Legal Opinion

Sunderland of Scotland, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 29, 2001No. Court 97-04-00680Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Musgrave, Judge:

Before the Court are Rule 56 cross-motions for summary judgment on whether there is a cognizable mistake of fact, clerical error, or inadvertence in entry of “pullover” garments for which reliquidation under 19 U.S.C. § 1520(c)(1) is appropriate. The plaintiff invoked jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) to commence this action, however that properly depends on whether its claim is colorable. See NEC Electronics U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 13 CIT 214, 709 F. Supp. 1171 (1989); Computime, Inc. v. United States, 9 CIT 553, 622 F. Supp. 1083 (1985). Accordingly, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Hambro Automotive Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  3. United States v. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  4. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  5. Executone Information Systems v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API