Legal Opinion
Megan Khader v. Les Aspin, Secretary of Defense
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 17, 1993No. 93-1008PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Megan Khader appeals pro se the district court’s order granting judgment in favor of Secretary of Defense Les Aspin 1 in her employment discrimination action under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16, and dismissing her action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Khader claims that the district court erred by concluding that she had failed to exhaust her administrative remedies. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
FACTS
In December, 1986, Khader was hired as an “intermittent regular schedule category cashier” for the Army and Air Force…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- David Kiehn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- William Morrison Smith v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Raeford D. WADE, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SECRETARY OF the ARMY, Etc., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- MacKenzie v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Jane Doe, and Jane Roe and Jane Roe 2, Proposed-Intervenors-Appellants v. Oberweis DairyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Woodman v. RunyonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Shikles v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.