Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Brooke

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1966PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

Plaintiff has suffered almost total loss of vision which is alleged to have been as a result of taking a drug, chloroquine, prescribed for her treatment by defendant Brooke, an M.D., and manufactured by defendant Sterling Drug Company. In this action she charged Dr. Brooke with malpractice and charged negligence and breach of warranty against Sterling. At the conclusion of the trial all parties moved for a directed verdict. The court found that there was no negligence on the part of either defendant and no breach of warranty as to defendant Sterling. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eckleberry v. Kaiser Foundation Northern HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Joseph Milling Co. v. First Bank of JosephOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Leonard v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. Toole v. Richardson-Merrell Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API