Capitol Bank & Trust Co. v. Pre-Schools, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant claims to be aggrieved by the allowance of the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. We conclude that there was error.
The moving party must demonstrate “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that [he] is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Mass.R.Civ.P. 56(c), 365 Mass. 824 (1974). See Community Natl. Bank v. Dawes, 369 Mass. 550, 554 (1976). The instant case resembles Community Natl. Bank only to the extent that the plaintiff seeks to recover on promissory notes. Contrary to the situation in that case, the present defendant, by the affidavit of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Williams v. GoochCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1861
- Royal Bank of Canada v. ConnollyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- Key Capital Corp. v. M&S LIQUIDATING CORP.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- John Beaudette, Inc. v. Sentry Insurance a Mutual Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Telecon, Inc. v. Emerson-Swan, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Eastern Tank of Peabody, Inc. v. MooreMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1986
- Doe v. XYZ Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.