Legal Opinion
State v. Blankenship
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided October 6, 2004No. 1998-03, 1999-03, 2000-03, 2001-03, 2002-03, 2003-03, 2004-03, 2005-03PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · HerveyHervey, J.
The issue in this case is whether the County Attorney of Travis County “made” this particular appeal in the Court of Appeals. We hold that the County Attorney “made” this appeal.
A City of Austin municipal court convicted appellee of several violations of two city ordinances. See State v. Blankenship, 123 S.W.3d 99, 101 (Tex.App.-Austin 2003). A county court reversed that decision and the State appealed. See id. The City timely filed a notice of appeal and an amended notice of appeal with the latter stating that the “County Attorney has consented to the City Attorney prosecuting this…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. RieweCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- State v. MullerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- State v. SheltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- State v. Blankenship, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
4Cited by11 opinions
- State v. Blankenship, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- State v. White, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- State v. Zachary PalmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Palmer, ZacharyTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Gary Gates, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.