Legal Opinion

State v. Yarham

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 16, 1928PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

The indictment in the iiistant case is predicated on Section 13045, Code of 1924, which reads :

“If any person designedly and by false pretense, * * * with intent to defraud, obtain * * * the signature of any person to any written instrument, the false making of which would be punished as forgery, he shall be imprisoned * * * ”

The written instrument in question is as follows:

“$26.50 Fairfield, Iowa. March 24, 1927.
“On Demand for Value received, I promise to'pay to C. H. Yarham, or order, at Des Moines, Iowa, Twenty six 50/100 Dol lars'. Given for labor and material to be used in making rugs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FoxtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  2. Haley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. State v. CordaroSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. State v. BaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. MullenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. State v. CottonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  4. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. State v. HuckinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API