Legal Opinion

State v. Cordaro

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 13, 1928PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

The indictment charged that the defendant did willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously utter and publish a forged instrument, with intent then and there to defraud, in that:

“The said Joe Cordaro, on or about the 17th day of December, A. D. 1924, in the county of Polk in the state of Iowa, having in his possession a certain instrument, — to wit, a check with an indorsement thereon purporting to be that of one Orpha Link, — said indorsement being false and forged, and said defendant knowing the same to be false and forged, said check and indorsement being in words and figures as follows, to wit:
“C…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. VandewaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. State v. BlodgettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. State v. LamberttiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. State v. GillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. CottonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  2. State v. ManlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. State v. SchenkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  4. State v. BoldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  5. C. E. Erickson Co. v. Iowa National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API