Legal Opinion

People v. Guzman

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1996No. B092262PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, P. J.

By jury Miguel Guzman and Antonio Guzman were convicted of first degree burglary and grand theft of personal property. Appellant Miguel Guzman was also convicted of second degree robbery, and the court made a finding he had a prior felony conviction for which he had served a separate prison term. (Pen. Code, §§ 459, 487, subd. (a), 211, 667.5, subd. (b).) Appellant Miguel Guzman appeals from the judgment and contends he was improperly sentenced to concurrent terms for the burglary, grand theft and robbery in violation of Penal Code section 654. Appellant Antonio Guzman…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. EstesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Moses Corona-Sanchez, A/K/A Enrique Sanchez-CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. People v. OrtegaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. DowdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. Tuyen Thanh LeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. People v. WynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API