Legal Opinion

People v. Estes

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 1983No. Crim. 23762PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LOW, P. J.

In this case we affirm a robbery conviction for the taking of personal property owned by Sears, Roebuck & Company in the immediate presence of a security guard, using force and fear to complete the taking. Defendant Curtis Estes appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) by personal use of a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (b)) and petty theft (Pen. Code, § 484) arising out of the theft of merchandise from a Sears department store. Defendant entered the Sears store in Larwin Plaza, Vallejo, wearing only jeans and a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. LaursenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. People v. GomezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API