Legal Opinion

B & C Investments, Inc. v. F & M National Bank & Trust

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 15, 1995No. 83677PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUNTER, Presiding Judge:

Appellant B & C Investments, Inc. (B & C), seeks review of the trial court’s order which vacated an October 21, 1986 default judgment against Appellee/Garnishee F & M National Bank & Trust Company (Bank). 1 Bank sought vacation of the default judgment on several grounds, namely, that judgment had been rendered against an entity which did not exist, that B & C failed to give Bank notice of its intent to take default or that default had been taken, and that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over Bank based on improper service. In its motion for summary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Graff v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Chaney v. ReddinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. Capitol Federal Savings Bank v. BewleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. Swanson v. GickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. Krown SystemsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Estate of Vaughan v. VaughanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. Gonzalez ex rel. Gonzalez v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Estate of Vaughan v. VaughanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  5. Whitfield, Ronald DwayneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API