Legal Opinion

Parisi v. Michigan Townships Ass'n

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1983No. Docket 61662PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Does the two-year statute of limitations governing a malicious prosecution action begin to run when the trial court enters judgment in the alleged maliciously prosecuted action or, where an appeal is taken, when the appellate decision is rendered? On December 7, 1981, the trial court ruled that the action accrued at the time the circuit court judgment was entered and granted defendant’s motion for accelerated judgment. Plaintiff appeals as of right. This question of first impression in Michigan comes to us upon an agreed statement of facts which has been submitted for purposes of this appeal.

I…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Campbell v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Commercial Credit Corp. v. EnsleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Lefever v. American Red CrossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Board of Education of Miami Trace Local School District v. MartingMadison County Court of Common Pleas · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Texas Beef Cattle Co. v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ronald Wolfe, Jr. v. Allan PerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. One Thousand Fleet Ltd. Partnership v. GuerrieroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Michaels v. State of NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API