Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 24, 2000No. A00A1422, A00A1435PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Chief Judge.

In these cases we are asked to determine if the four-year statute of limitation in damage to realty actions 1 or the six-year statute of limitation in breach of written contract actions 2 governs a breach of contract claim for house damage caused by the use of synthetic stucco. We conclude that the six-year statute of limitation applies to such a contract claim. We therefore reverse the trial court’s summary judgment rulings that the homeowners’ breach of contract claims against the builder are barred by the four-year statute of limitation. However, we affirm the trial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Corporation of Mercer University v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  2. Hanna v. McWilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Hudgins v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Benning Construction Co. v. Lakeshore Plaza Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. Fort Oglethorpe Associates II, Ltd. v. Hails Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Western Pacific Mutual Insurance v. DaviesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. Colormatch Exteriors, Inc. v. HickeySupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  3. Costrini v. Hansen Architects, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Stimson v. George Laycock, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Feinour v. Ricker Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API