Legal Opinion

Hahn v. Bettingen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 6, 1901No. Nos. 12,748—(98)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $10,000 for breach of promise of marriage. The case was tried before Otis, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $6,000. From an order denying a motion for a new trial on condition that plaintiff consent to a reduction of the verdict to $4,000, which condition was duly complied with, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for an alleged-breach of promise on the part of appellant to marry respondent. The trial in the court below resulted in a verdict in respondent’s favor for $6,000, which the trial judge reduced to $4,000, upon condition that a new trial be granted in case plaintiff • should refuse to accept the reduced amount; but she acceded to the reduction, and defendant appealed. ,

We are asked to consider the case under three heads: First, that respondent’s testimony is so inherently and apparently unreliable as to justify the conclusion that the evidence does…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Hess' EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Smith v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. American Book Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. PeimeislSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Teal v. Scandinavian-American BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Simpson v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Meemken v. O'HARASupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API